anghraine: david rintoul as darcy in the 1980 p&p in a red coat (darcy (1980))
[personal profile] anghraine
A post just crossed my dash about how only the privileged can afford to stay calm. I see these posts … pretty much all the time. And it’s true to an extent.

But that extent is “in some alternate universe where everyone is neurotypical.”

I cannot speak for every neuroatypical person. I can’t even speak for every autistic person. But I am very, very certain that I can speak for more than just myself when I say nope.

I can’t handle anger. It doesn’t matter whether it’s my own or someone else’s. I just–I can’t. It short-circuits my brain and sends me spinning into total panic. You have to see–okay, I don’t want to dictate other people’s emotional expression, but I don’t think you understand.

A shoe dropping to the floor makes me jump. The slam of a door echoes inside my head. Sunshine hurts my eyes and the sound of puppies screeches along my nerves. Everything is so bright and loud, it’s–simply existing in the world is painful and exhausting, do you understand? Staying calm is how I’m able to function in it without flying apart. It gives me a sort of oasis from everything else and it gives me a sense of control.

But no matter how calm I am, I can’t deal with anger for very long. And it’s not that everyone has to cater to my specific needs, it really isn’t. I understand that people need to be able to express anger. (I do too!) And that people need a place where they don’t always have to be soft-spoken and accommodating. But these posts that suggest that there is no place for serenity in social justice circles–that there are no circles that should be structured and calm, that that’s solely about caving into the oppressors or whatever–and it’s not just random Tumblr posts that say this–it seems to me that it’s saying that social justice, itself, is not for me. It’s not for people like me. It’s the difference between “not everything needs to cater to you” and “nothing should ever cater to you.”

And, frankly, the idea that it's always up to us to adapt ourselves to other people, without exception–that’s not anything new or progressive. And so often, it seems like disability is ignored or belatedly tacked on, that others’ empowerment requires us to be essentially barred from entry to social justice circles–not this one there or that over there, but all of them.

on 2018-12-14 01:21 am (UTC)
elperian: un: tbelchers [tumblr] (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] elperian
I can only speak for myself, but it also seems to conflate anger with action - as if people who are calm (or trying to be calm for themselves) aren't doing anything. The signalling component of this is also relevant, e.g. "I'm angry, why aren't you angry, do you not care?!" even if it's not meant to be selfish, self-centered, or ill-intended. I'm pretty lots of activists are pissed off on some level, and that's what pushed them into activism, but it's not a way to live 24/7.

on 2018-12-14 06:53 pm (UTC)
meridian_rose: pen on letter background  with text  saying 'writer' (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] meridian_rose
I don't think anyone should be expected to be angry. For some, righteous anger is fuelling. But for others, anger just burns them out. For others, like yourself, it isn't an option.
Taking more positive steps is probably better; saying "I'm concerned about this thing, how can we help make it better" gets things done without anyone else hurting. But Tumblr has never been good at nuance; there's often the One True Way presented and anyone not toeing the line is the enemy. *sigh*

Profile

anghraine: vader extending his lightsaber; text: and now for the airing of grievances! (Default)
Anghraine

May 2026

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3456 789
1011121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 18th, 2026 01:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios