AO3 meme!

Jul. 2nd, 2024 03:54 pm
anghraine: elizabeth accepting darcy's proposal in "austen's pride" (darcy and elizabeth (austen's pride))
I am pretty sure I stole this from [personal profile] meridian_rose! I do love me a fic meme :D

Rules: go to your AO3 account and find the following:

1. What rating do you write most of your fics under?


Overwhelmingly general, at 165 out of 222 fics. This isn't that surprising—maybe a bit more than I expected, but I can be a bit skittish about romance for someone who likes it a lot.

2. What are your top three fandoms?

In a totally shocking twist: Star Wars, Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen, and Lord of the Rings - J. R. R. Tolkien. The gap between the first two (tied at 67 fics each) and LOTR (27) is pretty vast, and the "real" #3 was the fandom tag for the SW original trilogy specifically. I know I often feel uncomfortable writing Tolkien fic, much more than Austen or SW, despite writing so much meta about Middle-earth, so again, this isn't a big surprise.

3. What is the top character you write about?

I am extremely sure this one is going to be Darcy!

Yup, it was! He's tagged in 53 fics to Elizabeth's 43, with Luke and Leia following closely at 39 and 34.

4. What are the top three pairings you write about?

The first is, of course, Darcy/Elizabeth, the unbeatable victor of all such contests when it comes to me. It has twenty more fics than the runner-up, which of course is Jyn/Cassian (a big gap, though Darcy/Elizabeth has the advantage of very considerable seniority; I wrote my first D/E fic in 2005, while Jyn and Cassian didn't even exist until 2016). The third most-common romantic pairing in my fics is ... honestly, I think it's got to be Cesare/Lucrezia from The Borgias. I know, I know! And yup, it's got 11 fics, trailing behind platonic Luke and Leia fics (12), Jyn/Cassian (19), and Darcy/Elizabeth (39).

5. What are the top three additional tags?

I wondered if the "always a different sex" tag would hit the top three, but let's see ... actually, no! It's only at #4, following from three rather boring winners. My most common additional tag is "Canon Compliant" (71), "One Shot" (66), and "Drabble" (39). I'm guessing there is quite a lot of overlap between these. The only specific premises or subjects to appear in any of the top ten are the genderbending tags (these days I typically use "Always A Different Sex" but I used to use the vaguer "Gender Changes" tag) and the "Brother-Sister Relationships" tag. If there isn't overlap between the two genderbending tags, together they would actually beat out "Drabble" (the usual tag has 37 fics and the old one 14).

6. Did any of this surprise you?

LOL, not really. I am what I am.

Tagging: [personal profile] croclock, [personal profile] alias_sqbr, [personal profile] sixbeforelunch, [personal profile] elperian, [personal profile] brynnmclean, [personal profile] heckofabecca, [personal profile] incognitajones, and [personal profile] lizbee, if any of you want to do it!

anghraine: a screenshot of fitzwilliam and georgiana darcy standing together in the 1980 p&p miniseries (darcys (1980))
Rambling about family relationships based on my research for my PhD exams (16th- to 18th-century British literature):

One of the things that came up in my reading for my exams was, inevitably, ~the rise of the companionate marriage~. The usual framing is often over-simplistic and very heterocentric; people sometimes talk as if there was no concept of marriage involving romantic ties (sometimes even exclusive romantic ties!) until the 17th/18th century or something.

That said
, IMO there’s something to it, at least in England. As someone who had mostly done research in the 18th and earlier 19th centuries, 16th-century takes on marriage often sound like they come from Earth 2. Over time, there’s more and more emphasis on the ties of marriage, companionship, and parenthood in cultural discourse, with other family relationships increasingly subordinated to those, even while ideas from earlier periods about the importance of those other family relationships persisted in some ways.

Like, there was a lot of talk about how brothers were supposed to care for the interests of their siblings, especially their unmarried sisters, but there’s also a lot of talk about how that was increasingly not happening, and how the ties between brothers and sisters were becoming less important and less reliable as a "net" for unmarried women.

Men increasingly resented their sisters for taking resources that would otherwise go to their wives and children, or simply denied them meaningful resources altogether in favor of focusing on their own wives/children. It was a really well-established dynamic by the time that Wollstonecraft wrote about it in Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Austen in Sense and Sensibility.

One of the things that S&S highlights is that John and Fanny Dashwood’s son does not need the resources that are denied to John’s sisters. He already has a comfortable separate inheritance. John prioritizes Fanny and Harry over his sisters both because of his character and because doing so had become very culturally normalized by then.

By the 20th century (at least in the UK and US), people prioritizing their spouses and children over their siblings or other connections was and is often going to seem "well, of course they would." But the degree to which that is the case is really influenced by cultural norms and expectations. Going back to Austen (surprise), she has an intriguing passage about it that speaks to the shifts in how the sibling tie was seen and experienced:
An advantage this, a strengthener of love, in which even the conjugal tie is beneath the fraternal. Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply; and it must be by a long and unnatural estrangement, by a divorce which no subsequent connection can justify, if such precious remains of the earliest attachments are ever entirely outlived. Too often, alas! it is so.—Fraternal love, sometimes almost every thing, is at others worse than nothing.
I don’t even have siblings (sort of surrogate siblings, but not people I was actually brought up with), but I do find the evolution and melancholy over this really interesting. And I do think that a lot of the, hmm, enthusiasm over the rise of the “companionate marriage” tends to ignore the cost of it.

Tagged: #i am pretty sure this is why austen keeps returning to darcy's sense of responsibility and deep affection for his sister #and why elizabeth thinks his way of talking about georgiana should have told her about his character #i've seen people be like 'just bc you care about your own family members doesn't mean you're a good person wtf' about that #but it was a big deal at the time! #wickham brings it up as something that people in general praise darcy for too #obviously this was of really immediate concern for austen herself #but plenty of people write about it over the years #and it's just ... idk #complicated

[ETA 5/28/2024: this is actually extremely relevant to my dissertation and something I was literally just writing about today!]

anghraine: a stone manor amidst green climbing plants (haddon hall)
kungfunurse said:

Hiya! So I’m re-reading S&S (as one does) and I’ve got a couple of questions. 1) Do you think Mr. Palmer is on the autistic spectrum? The way he misses most social cues and whatnot - idk. And 2) Would it have been normal at the time for Marianne to go months without hearing from Willoughby and still not suspect that he’s lost interest, or was this another example of her being lost in fantasy? Thanks!!

I replied:

1) I honestly don’t know. I haven’t read S&S in a long time, so it’s hard to say. I’ll keep an eye out next time, though!

2) Willoughby couldn’t write openly to Marianne without raising very serious general expectations, so that’s probably how she justifies his silence to herself.

As a sidenote, this is why Darcy hand-delivers his letter to Elizabeth—it would be exceptionally awkward for her if he sent a letter. It’s also significant that the Gardiners wonder if he’s going to send a letter/note after Elizabeth when they leave Pemberley—they’re guessing that Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship has advanced much further than it really has.

/grump

May. 13th, 2024 10:47 am
anghraine: darcy and elizabeth after the second proposal in the 1979 p&p (darcy and elizabeth [proposal])
I've got a lot of P&P hills to die on, but two ideas I will absolutely reject to the end of time:

1. Darcy or Elizabeth has a redemption arc.

Character growth is not redemption. Even while depicting their parallel character arcs, Austen emphasizes the extent to which they remain essentially the same people in terms of their basic flaws (e.g. Elizabeth's continued misjudgments via reductive schemas, Darcy's cold standoffishness upon his return to Hertfordshire), but also that they were always unusually good people despite their fuck-ups and overall arcs of improvement.

2. Darcy/Elizabeth is enemies to lovers.

There's a window of time when Elizabeth genuinely hates Darcy, though even then I don't think she regards him as her enemy. Darcy does not ever hate her or regard her as an enemy, he just initially doesn't like her or find her attractive. One-sided veiled hostility towards a social acquaintance is not enemies to lovers material, sorry.
anghraine: simone ashley as kate sharma; text: catherine darcy (catherine darcy [simone])
I'm taking a brief break from my dissertation to ... uh, amuse myself by figuring out my readers' ranking of my genderbending fics on AO3.

Rules I'm applying: 1) I'm only including fic verses that are collectively at least 2000 words long because, well, I do have to go back to the diss, 2) verses comprised of multiple fics are ranked according to either the popularity of the series as a whole or the most popular individual fic (depending on which is higher; not combining them because there's a lot of overlap), 3) I'm considering both bookmarks and kudos in my judgment—we'll see if it makes a difference, and 4) I'm ignoring everything with less than 30 kudos and 5 bookmarks.

1. First Impressions | 215 bookmarks | 876 kudos | genderbent characters: Elizabeth Bennet (-> Henry Bennet) and Fitzwilliam Darcy (-> Catherine Darcy)

This is a genderswapped retelling of Pride and Prejudice set in its original period (not really a true "what if"). All stats are specifically for the original (completed) 36k fic. It individually beats out every possible stat for every other fic in the series as well as the series as a whole. (Note: The overall series is 44k words long.)

2. Lucy Skywalker series | 163 bookmarks | 406 kudos (The Jedi and the Sith Lord) | genderbent characters: Luke Skywalker (-> Lucy Skywalker)

This is a genderbent AU that mostly, but not completely, sticks to the rails of canon until the end of the ESB timeline, at which point it swerves into the "real" AU. The Jedi and the Sith Lord is the sequel to The Imperial Menace/the ESB plot, and the third fic in the main series, focusing on the consequences of Vader capturing Lucy. It's technically completed at 70k, but only in the sense that it explores what happens to/with Lucy and Vader until the nature of her captivity fundamentally changes, and everything after that will be a separate fic but hasn't been written yet. Although none of the individual fics have as many bookmarks as the series as a whole, my #2, #3, and #4 most bookmarked genderbent fics are all for the Lucyverse. (Note: the overall series is 129k words long.)

3. Love, Pride & Delicacy | 25 bookmarks | 163 kudos | genderbent characters: Fitzwilliam Darcy (-> Catherine Darcy, for convenience)

This is an actual Elizabeth/f!Darcy "what if" femslash AU rather than a retelling, though a slow one—it's still early in the overall story at 25k. It's also placed in the original P&P setting. There is no wider series.

4. The Lady of Gondor | 25 bookmarks | 119 kudos (we also are daughters of the great) | genderbent characters: Faramir (-> Fíriel)

This is a deeply self-indulgent Aragorn/f!Faramir/Éowyn AU, though it's not only a WIP but split into different vaguely related fics (some of which are also WIPs!) about some aspect of the verse in relation to Fíriel. I think the norms of Gondor and Middle-earth make the gender change particularly significant (in some ways more than any other verse), so actual plot and relationship changes tend to be the focus. The kudos are for the specific linked fic, which is a WIP at nearly 5k and the most Éowyn-centric of them. (Note: the overall series is about 9.5k words long.)

5. The Edge of Darkness | 17 bookmarks | 106 kudos | genderbent characters: Tarrlok (-> Taraka)

This is a genderbent f!Tarrlok AU, though told entirely from Noatak/Amon's perspective, and to some extent more about the impact on him than on Taraka herself (though she's extremely important to the fic). Even more than that, the linked fic is focused on the effect of the change on their family dynamics as children, until teenage Noatak leaves her behind per canon. The fic can look like a retelling à la First Impressions, since the basic plot points don't change, but the larger series is on course to swerve into full "what if" territory as well. However, like First Impressions, these stats are all for the completed opening fic (18k) and not the longer WIP series (32k), which is temporarily paused at the point where 37-year-old Taraka openly identifies Amon as Noatak. CW: child abuse.

6. Blood and Fire | 16 bookmarks | 67 kudos | genderbent characters: Tarrlok (-> Taraka) and Noatak (-> Nataka)

This is a dark(er) AU of The Edge of Darkness in which Noatak/Amon is also genderbent, and the bloodbending siblings never separated. Taraka fled home with Nataka back in the day, they only grew closer (...too close), and although Taraka still ended up on the Republic City council, her true loyalty is to Amon. She promptly turns Korra over when Amon shows up, which is where the fic begins; it's told entirely through Korra's attempts to navigate her circumstances as a prisoner of the Equalists. CW: incest, complicated F/F/F dubcon??? emotional bonding kink with occasional violence yet little overt romance and no sex. I am what I am. The stats are for the completed (though deliberately ambiguous) main fic, which is 10k, and not the side fics or the series as a whole (13k).

7. The Queer Rogue One AU | 12 bookmarks | 57 kudos (the words we've both fallen under) | genderbent characters: Cassian Andor (-> Cassia Andor)

This is, on one level, a relatively straightforward genderbent!Cassian AU that is more or less complete at 13k. The underlying concepts are: a) what if my male fave was a hot lesbian and my ship was f/f and b) what if we headcanon every single member of the main team as queer in some capacity :D and c) the SW universe is so blatantly patriarchal in the films that it's a particularly interesting setting for exploring the effects of the gender change on someone like Cassia, a female revolutionary and spy :D :D. It's a little challenging to properly evaluate where it sits wrt stats because I revised the scattered, vaguely connected scraps of the universe into a single fic through both sentence-level revisions and significant additions, but that revision is only on Tumblr (where the link currently goes to, sorry) and my GoogleDrive, not AO3. It's not even a series in my heart! But it is on AO3. Evaluate as you will, but when I finally get around to converting the AO3 version to the correct format this may or may not change. For now this is where it goes by AO3 stats.

8. Daughters of Númenor series | 5 bookmarks | 33 kudos (the voices of the sea) | genderbent characters: all Númenórean throwbacks in LOTR, but specifically Aragorn (-> Aranor), Faramir (-> Míriel), Denethor (-> Andreth), and Imrahil (-> Imraphel)

As might be guessed, this is an AU where every Númenórean throwback mentioned in LOTR is genderbent (in the backstory, this also includes Ivriniel and Finduilas of Dol Amroth, who become Túrin, Prince of Dol Amroth, and Gwindor of Dol Amroth). It's Aranor/Míriel and definitely focused on them despite the broader change (where Arwen is a non-factor for the OT3 in The Lady of Gondor because she went to Valinor with Celebrían, she actually is present in Middle-earth in this series, though unfortunately very straight). While Fíriel in The Lady of Gondor was never expected to be a warrior and gets on reasonably well with Denethor, this AU is more about the broader effects—so even though we rarely see f!Denethor/Andreth, it's significant that she was a trailblazer as a female warrior, loremaster, and ultimately the first female ruler of Gondor, inadvertently laying a foundation that Aranor could build on later (which would have horrified Andreth herself!). The specific fic with the most kudos in the series, linked above, is a nearly 2k fic about the effect of Faramir's canonical visions on Míriel. (Note: the overall series is currently 3k words long.)
anghraine: david rintoul as darcy in the 1980 p&p in a red coat (darcy (1980))
My actual, serious opinion on why Darcy thinks living 50 miles from your family is relatively close while Elizabeth thinks it's far:

Darcy is so profoundly out-of-touch due to wealth, property, influence, his families' status, etc that he truly does not comprehend the complications and expenses of travel for normal people even among the landowning classes. Like, there's all this ink spilled on his status as a gentleman/landowning commoner and what really differentiates a gentleman like Mr Bennet from one like Darcy if anything, and what that would mean in their social context, blah blah. But in pragmatic terms, Darcy's lifestyle and his interests as a landowner have far more in common with the nobility to which he is connected than the typical lifestyles of the gentry.

Darcy talking about 50 miles of good road being nothing in terms of inconvenience and blithely ignoring the costs of either owning or hiring horses, the complications of maintaining a horse if you do own it, the complications around hiring or owning the vehicle drawn by the horse(s), how much more you'd need to pay in services if you don't own the vehicle/horses, what using that vehicle for travel would entail for the workings of the estate or your trade if your family does own it, the cost of stopping along the way, what's lost by the duration of the journey, etc etc. These are things that even fairly well-off landowners like the Bennets would have to deal with in terms of the convenience of travel on "good road" (and also clues us into the prosperity of the Gardiners). These concerns do not even occur to Darcy as problems to consider. This doesn't represent a malicious, personal callousness so much as the genuine obliviousness that arises from extreme socioeconomic inequality. These kinds of problems simply melt away in Darcy's life (read: there are people who make them melt away) and as a result, he truly does not comprehend the impact of prosaic difficulties on the feasibility of something like travel for people like the Lucases or Bennets. The only calculation of convenience that seems to be happening in his head is the effect of distance and road quality on the timing of the journey.

(I think his confusion at people who have family libraries but aren't buying books at this super important literary moment reflects this as well. Books were still quite expensive at the time. He does not appear to grasp that "always buying books" like he does is literally not an option for most people, even in the gentry. He's right about the important literary moment, but "buying things costs money" is a concept that seems not to even enter his calculus.)

My much less serious opinion on why Darcy thinks living 50 miles from your family is "a very easy distance" while Elizabeth thinks it's far:

His landowning family members don't have to think about these problems any more than he does, and if I were Lady Catherine de Bourgh's nephew, I would also consider living 50 mi away from my relatives pretty damn close.
anghraine: darcy kissing elizabeth's hand after their engagement in "austen's pride" (darcy and elizabeth (engagement))
I have a longer post in drafts about it, but … one of the things I really enjoy about Austen is that she doesn’t hold back judgment of her characters or even altogether deny them agency (though her fandom sometimes does!), but she also frequently goes out of her way to highlight the experiences that have influenced their development into who they are.

Especially (though not exclusively) when it comes to her main characters, her good people aren’t good because they just had the innate moral fortitude to shrug off their upbringings or the things that have happened to them, which seems to be a lot of people’s idea of goodness. Austen main characters are good people and they’re impacted by their experiences and have qualities (often flaws) that clearly arise more out of upbringing than any essential underlying characteristic. Goodness isn’t just about super-resilience, but neither is experience wholly defining.

It’s not at all restricted to Austen, of course, but even now (…particularly now), it’s so refreshing.

Tagged: #i'm so tired of the resilience narrative or blank slate narrative #and i was thinking of how elizabeth/darcy is one of comparatively few ships i'm really into where the characters #are just about squeaky clean—and i think part of it (aside of their general magnificence lol) is it's not a magic resilience thing at all #she is extremely clear about the ways in which they have been influenced—mostly for the worse—by their experiences #they're allowed to be good AND to be affected by their lives in natural ways #shouldn't be as refreshing as it is but it's one of the things i keep going back for

[ETA 4/30/2024: I was also thinking about Mr Collins, of all people—Austen doesn't justify him in any way, obviously, but also doesn't try to pretend that his upbringing and history aren't what made him who he is. The effects of education, upbringing, and general history on people's characters and morals are a constant preoccupation of her books, IMO.]
anghraine: a bg3 female half-elf cleric with messy wavy hair and a serious expression (larissa (semi-profile))
Digging up the links to so many DW tags got me wondering what tags I've actually used more than any others over here. It will probably look different after I'm done cross-posting, and maybe I'll check again then. But as of right now, the evening of 29 April 2024, this is every tag I've used over 100 times since my first post on 19 July 2009—

A. Tags used over 500 times:

1. #site: tumblr

This is far and away my most commonly used tag (used 1739 times), mainly because I've been cross-posting old Tumblr posts to Dreamwidth for years now, but also because I use it for every post referring to basically anything going on at Tumblr as well as the cross-posts.

2. #fandom: star wars

This feels like the "real" #1 tag, used 668 times and beating out all other fandoms (and indeed, everything). I suspect this is partly because I got into SW after making my DW account, but at a time when journal fandom was still quite active, so one of my most intense periods of SW fannishness was based here (or synced with lj, so the content is here as well). And then when you add in SW cross-posts and "overflow" material from Tumblr once Disney SW got kicking, especially after Rogue One, it's enough for the SW tag to jump ahead of every other tag but the Tumblr one.

3. #genre: meta

I periodically whine about feeling like I'm perceived more as a meta writer than a fic writer, even though I care more about fic and derive far more joy from it ... but I've tagged 667 posts with the meta tag and far less with any fic-related tag. In fairness, I originally conceived as "meta" as basically any post talking about a canon or fandom that wasn't fic, no matter how abrupt, so things I wouldn't really describe as "meta" these days fell under the tag until pretty recently. Even so, I've posted a lot more serious meta than fic!

4. #fandom: austen

The only surprise here is that this one wasn't even higher. I've tagged 640 posts with it over the years, and if you've followed me on Tumblr for awhile, you know there's only more coming. I'm pretty sure it'll beat out SW in the end for sheer quantity.

5. #fandom: middle-earth

While the previous three tags are clustered pretty closely together, there's a jump from the 640 Austen posts to a mere 505 Tolkien posts. This is partly because a bunch of my Tolkien stuff never made it onto Dreamwidth (that is, it happened on sites that are now dead or on lj before Dreamwidth was ever founded, or much later, was posted over at Tumblr and much of it hasn't made its way back over here). It's still one of my biggest fandoms, obviously; SW, Austen, and Tolkien will probably always be the Big Three for me.

Read more... )
anghraine: a painting of a man c. 1800 with a book and a pen; the words love, pride, and delicacy in the upper corner (darcy (love)
An anon asked:

Do you think Darcy's shy? I see a lot on tumblr about it but I've never been completely convinced. I don't see him as being particularly shy or embarrassed until after Elizabeth has rejected him. I'd love to know your thoughts

I replied:

I don’t think Austen’s Darcy is shy as such (though the reading goes back a long ways), but I do think he is quite genuinely uncomfortable in a broad range of social situations.

I don’t think he’s manufacturing or exaggerating his discomfort and difficulties with people when he discusses them at Rosings, say. And I think we see it pretty early on when (as one instance) he has to come up with an intermediary step to work himself up to talking to Elizabeth when he’s only just become interested in her.

And while it’s later, I think the efforts that Elizabeth goes to during their engagement to shield him from situations he finds difficult make a lot more sense (and are much more satisfying, character-wise) if there’s a real inherent discomfort she’s trying to ameliorate. IMO the dynamic there at the end is an “answer” of sorts to the discussion at Rosings, when Darcy didn’t see the need to put in any effort, and Elizabeth was completely dismissive of his difficulties; in the end, Darcy puts in effort and Elizabeth tries to help him.

That all said, discomfort is not the same as shyness—I don’t think he’s at all insecure or timid the way that some people suggest, or the way Georgiana is. He’s introverted, but he’s also straightforward and confident. He just has some people issues.
anghraine: rows of old-fashioned books lining shelves (books)
moggett responded to this post:

It also seems to utterly ignore how Elizabeth is also supposed to be overcoming her initial incorrect first impression of Darcy. It’s not like Elizabeth is perfect in the text while Darcy changes…

I replied:

Oh, definitely. With fandom, to be fair, you get a mix of that and more balanced takes, but I think academia generally (though not always) tends to resist the equality between them forwarded by P&P’s structure and dynamics.

I think it’s partly because P&P does a really good job of inviting readers to participate in Elizabeth’s perceptions and mistakes while leaving open the possibility of doing otherwise, which is especially uncomfortable for academics of a certain type (who are often not great at accepting being wrong), and all the more so for ones who can’t bring themselves to complicate their initial judgment of Elizabeth as the only truly right-thinking character.

It’s an old piece, but I remember reading an essay about how Darcy’s letter hijacks readerly sympathies that should continue to belong with Elizabeth to the point of provoking resentment from readers. I don’t think it actually does that for most readers (Darcy has always been popular, as Austen intended; when she was worrying about what her beloved niece would think of P&P, Austen wrote, "Her liking Darcy and Eliz[abe]th is enough. She might hate all the others if she would"). But it does have that effect for some people who are often prone to these academic approaches. But it’s—the evidence that Elizabeth’s judgments are skewed by her vanity is pretty copious by the time that Darcy proposes, if you’re willing to see it, and unwillingness to see it or give it ethical weight even upon re-reading is, I think, basically an unwillingness to engage with the novel on its own terms.

Tagged: #/rambles #i genuinely think a lot of academia handwringing over pride and prejudice comes from being unable to accept being wrong #with a side of hugely prioritizing theory to the point of neglecting the details of the text #i don't mean subtle detail either ... it's more of what strier was talking about imo
anghraine: elizabeth bennet from "austen's pride," singing her half of "the portrait song" (elizabeth (the portrait song))
[personal profile] beatrice_otter responded to this post:

Elizabeth is very sheltered, young, and relatively privileged compared to 99% of the people in England. She’s probably never really thought about power, that much, or how easily it is abused. Well, she’s probably seen abusive husbands and definitely seen neglectful/rude husbands (her dad), but there’s a gap between “this specific relationship can be Bad” and “there are a variety of relationships that can be Bad because there is a common factor (power) and how a person treats people in X circumstance is a pretty good indicator of how they’ll treat people in Y circumstance.”

And then she goes to Pemberly, and meets Mrs. Reynolds, and Mrs. Gardiner points out obliquely why Mrs. Reynolds’ report is worth considering, and Elizabeth puts all the pieces together. She’s smart, just sheltered.

“Oh, yeah! A guy who has power over a lot of people and takes care to treat them well, will probably treat other people in his power well. A guy who treats his servants and his sister/ward in such a way that they love and respect him would probably also treat his wife in such a way that she could love and respect him.”

It’s an important point.


I replied:

I sort of agree (though I don’t think Elizabeth’s epiphany here actually owes anything to Mrs Gardiner beyond what she generally owes the Gardiners; she gets there on her own). But I would disagree a bit about the significance that she sees in the extent of his power and how he uses it.

I don’t think his treatment of the vulnerable people within the range of his power—his underage sister, his housekeeper, his other servants, his tenants, the local poor—operates purely (or perhaps even primarily) as an index for how he’d treat his wife, even for Elizabeth. I’d argue that what strikes Elizabeth here is that how Darcy treats those people—people whose welfares she’s never really thought about before—matters enormously in its own right and thus, says a great deal about his general character. That’s certainly relevant to how he might act as a husband and I think she’s aware of it, but her overall thought process here is not particularly self-centered IMO.
anghraine: a painting of a man c. 1800 with a book and a pen; the words love, pride, and delicacy in the upper corner (darcy (love)
[personal profile] tree responded to this post:

i can’t remember the wording, but someone (mrs gardiner?) even comments on the significance of such a recommendation of his character by an intelligent servant.

I replied:

It’s in the narration, but yes!

The commendation bestowed on him by Mrs Reynolds was of no trifling nature. What praise is more valuable than the praise of an intelligent servant? As a brother, a landlord, a master, she considered how many people’s happiness were in his guardianship!—how much of pleasure or pain was it in his power to bestow!—how much of good or evil must be done by him!f

The text is emphatic that the judgment of Mrs Reynolds and those in roughly similar positions to her is immensely important as an indicator of Darcy’s (or anyone’s) true character. I think people do tend to treat it as "trifling," unfortunately—nice, but not terribly weighty, despite Austen underscoring its importance here and Elizabeth suddenly grasping that Darcy’s character is best understood by those who are directly subject to his power.

I actually find that moment super interesting in general, because I think the implication is that Elizabeth had not before understood this. It’s not that she never thought about it before because she didn’t have access to the people under Darcy’s power, IMO, but because she wasn’t thinking of his power in those terms. So it’s doing interesting work with Elizabeth’s characterization, too, but still gets relegated to an afterthought. :\
anghraine: darcy and elizabeth after the second proposal in the 1979 p&p (darcy and elizabeth [proposal])
An anon said (in clear response to this rant):

A big part of the reason that I don't read Forced Marriage P&P fic is because of the almost universal assumption that a pre-Hunsford Darcy would tyrannize Elizabeth, when it's pretty clear from the text that we're supposed to see his relationship with Georgiana (where his affection is always emphasised) and Mrs Reynold's glowing commendation (sweetest-tempered, never had a cross word, etc.) as proof that he's literally the opposite of a tyrant in how he interacts with people.

I replied:

Yes, exactly!

Fans and academics both tend to focus overwhelmingly on what the Pemberley scenes reveal about how Darcy has changed, but Austen dedicates a significant amount of time and space to revealing that Darcy was already different than Elizabeth thought.

Tagged: #tyrannical alpha male darcy is the worst

[ETA 4/2/2024: you can probably guess this, but if you're not particularly familiar with P&P fandom, my anon was referring to a fic trope common to P&P fics called FMS or "Forced Marriage Scenario." This is a fairly specific and formalized genre of P&P fanfic where Elizabeth and Darcy (usually before either has had their character development) are forced into marriage for reasons and they have to learn and grow and fall in love in that context. The reason why they're forced to marry can vary from something relatively believable to comically ludicrous, but it's pretty much always a fairly thin pretext to get them married off before they have matured. At least back when I still read these, FMS fics tended to depict Darcy as much more domineering and "alpha" and generally awful than canon Darcy—most often he is entirely unrecognizable in pretty much the exact way this anon was describing, yet still somehow framed as the only one for Elizabeth.

There are, or were, gentler FMS-adjacent tropes where the appeal is similar, but the author tries to sand down the problematic aspects of it, like AUs where Elizabeth accepts Darcy at Hunsford or shortly thereafter because of [pretext] and you still get the "getting to know each other in the context of engagement/marriage" aspect, but it's voluntary. I do get the appeal of the FMS and its various sister tropes—as a kid, I actually thought it was what was going to happen in P&P itself and was shocked!!!! that they got together in such a different way. But in practice, it's really difficult to manage this trope with P&P in a way that a) makes sense for Elizabeth, b) doesn't make Darcy a monster, c) doesn't fall into weird gender essentialist heteronormative shit, and d) doesn't completely lose the edge. Back in 2006, I was attempting a take on this with Such Terms of Cordiality that completely got rid of the consent issues by having Darcy and Elizabeth meet on much better terms, fall into a sort of calf love that would lead them to voluntarily marrying before they'd had their character arcs, and meant to focus on their clashes and growth within their marriage—but tbh I got distracted by subplots and wandered off.]
anghraine: a screenshot of fitzwilliam and georgiana darcy standing together in the 1980 p&p miniseries (darcys (1980))
So, at the end of Pride and Prejudice, Georgiana learns from Elizabeth that what a nearly 30-year-old man will accept from his 16-year-old sister/ward is not actually a model for how husbands and wives behave towards each other.

It seems that while Georgiana is initially unsettled by Elizabeth’s behavior towards Darcy, she (Georgiana) comes to accept that it’s fine for Elizabeth to treat Darcy in a very different way than Georgiana can treat him, with the implication that Georgiana herself will approach her own eventual husband very differently than she does Darcy (whom, we hear repeatedly, she regards as almost her father).

Of course, sometimes people take this to mean that Darcy and Georgiana’s relationship is actually ~problematic, and either he’s tyrannizing over her (intentionally or unintentionally) or, at the very least, the dynamic between them isn’t quite right. I unsurprisingly disagree; I think it’s perfectly fine for their relationship to verge on father-daughter when he’s much older and literally raised her, and that it will likely become somewhat less unbalanced as Georgiana fully grows up.

Meanwhile, an essay I read the other day takes it one step farther and argues that not only is Darcy tyrannizing over Georgiana, it indicates that he will also tyrannize over Elizabeth. Like … how you get from “Georgiana learns that this relationship isn’t what husband-wife relationships look like” to “actually this relationship is what Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship will look like” is kind of beyond me, except in an academia edgelord sort of way. Bleh.

Tagged: #the essay also completely ignored the explicit 'darcy and elizabeth were always grateful for their marriage' hea statement #like most of those sorts of takes do #and i ended up using it for my exam anyway #not that argument - a different part of it that was fine and relevant #i genuinely do think that pulling valuable aspects out of flawed work is okay and even important #but it still felt a bit dirty lol #thinking about it though #i've seen the attitude in fandom too #not the 'darcy will tyrannize over elizabeth' thing of course (...much) but #that the dynamic between a teenager and her 28-y-o guardian should be like everyday sibs and it's like... uh. no #even if we're setting the vast differences between 1795/1813 and 2021 aside #but i think part of the reason it annoys me so much is that i actually find the darcy-georgiana relationship really interesting #in how they're partially distanced bc of the age/authority gap yet also in other ways all the closer because of it #there's this repeated emphasis of how they're almost like father and daughter but it's always 'almost' and not quite there #like ... they're kind of stuck in this in-between space with very little personal direction and figured out this thing that works for them #and like. she's more talkative when he's around and they write long-ass letters to each other and-and-and #it /does/ work and the immensity of georgiana's love and respect is what ultimately saved her from wickham #i think it's both complicated and sweet and they're doing their best in a very human way
anghraine: adora as she-ra holding an unconscious catra in her arms (catradora (save the cat))
I’m a grown adult in my 30s, so obviously my thoughts periodically just wander off into “what if there was some AU with like, idk, combination transformations like Steven Universe, but kind of crossed with She-Ra, that create these ultra-superpowered combo/alternate selves, but only very few people are compatible enough to make it work … and obviously those people are my OTPs …”

Tagged: #i unironically amuse myself by imagining how i'd make it work for my peak otp #like there's this stealth magical society but nobody knows for sure unless they actually see someone performing magic #a lot of people genuinely don't know about it and a lot of magic folk assume the people they meet aren't magic #but they don't know #i'm thinking that the bingleys are quite genuinely non-magical and oblivious to the whole hidden magical society #some of the bennets are magical and most of them are in on it and they assume the whole netherfield party is oblivious #darcy of course is actually a mage on a par with elizabeth #but ultra-careful about not revealing it right until a major force shows up to fuck with the bennets #and bingley is incidentally injured and darcy is just like... hell with this and starts freezing people to trees #bingley: wait you're...???? #elizabeth: wait i was...wrong? #darcy: 'okay apparently i'm going to just... publicly do this... my family is NOT going to be happy #okay regrets later giant ice spikes now' #and anyway there's all this magical energy going on and elizabeth and darcy bump into each other on accident #and people have even actively tried to magically meld into a magic superbeing but they just can't #cue MAGICAL TRANSFORMATION SEQUENCE. lots of sparkles and swirly lights and glowy eyes #and when it settles there's like... this incredibly tall and attractive person who runs at maximum 'FIGHT ME' at all times #like she's ... part of the joy of imagining elizabeth+darcy is just imagining how incredibly arrogant their combo self would be lol #but genuinely brilliant and powerful and charismatic! just ridiculously proud though #bonus scenario: they don't know how to revert back and jane is like ... this is ... um... my cousin. miss ... dar...net. darnet. yes. #jane: it will look strange if you do not attend the ball but you do not need to be afraid! i will talk if you are uncomfortable and- #miss darnet: i fear nothing #i don't even know how to tag this organizationally
anghraine: a photo of emilie de ravin (a blonde, blue-eyed woman); text: lucy (lucy (emilie))
2020 fic writing post!

2020 was not my most productive year, but apart from the general state of 2020, I had a lot to do for my PhD and sleeping problems, so … /shrug. Anyway, this year—

- I got inspired by my “eh” feelings about TROS to outline a big chunk of my f!Luke series, and after (I think) four years of no updates, wrote some eighteen and a half chapters on The Jedi and the Sith Lord in something like six weeks. It’s now 67k.

- I updated my very niche Guild Wars 2 fic, pro patria, a kind of fragmented AU in which the “Missing Sister” option to say that the PC/Deborah are proud Ascalonians has a major effect on the PC’s character and story. I got Althea through a bunch of Ebonhawke/Fields of Ruin stuff, which was 50% of the motivation for writing it at all. It’s now at 89k.

- I finally finished the gift of men, the Eldarion/Faramir-and-Éowyn’s-daughter fic that has been rolling around my brain/Google Drive for years. It’s only a little over 1k, but I was really glad to get it finished and posted.

- I was overpowered with Ascalon/fuck the Searing feelings while playing the original Guild Wars and wrote a fic about the Prophecies PC’s last day (creatively called the last day) before the Searing. It’s also just over 1k and almost nobody read it, but it was really for me, so that’s okay.

- I updated tolerably well acquainted, my canon-compliant book-only P&P fic about how Elizabeth falls in love with Darcy from Pemberley onwards. Lydia just ran off with Wickham and Elizabeth reunited with Jane; I wrote about half of another chapter, but didn’t finish it. The fic as a whole is now 27k, which is kind of astounding to me tbh.

- I’d always thought of my Éowyn-meets-f!Faramir fic, we also are daughters of the great, as a one-shot, but got inspired by their canon scenes to take it further … and then got waylaid by Merry feelings? I don’t know. I also wrote about half of another chapter of this one before exams struck, so that’s partly done. I’d really like to get to the hair mingling scene! Someday. It’s 4800 words.

- I haven’t posted much of it (just this) or named it, but I started a fic about Darcy’s family (canonical and head-canonical) reacting to his engagement to Elizabeth/Elizabeth herself. It’s part of the tolerably well acquainted continuity, I think, and a kind of fun experiment with different voices. It’s 1500 words so far.

- I started a fic about Faramir’s birth and early childhood, but it stalled partway through dealing with tiny Faramir’s first dream of Númenor. I might get back to it someday. It’s 1300 words.

- I also brainstormed a Star Wars/Dungeons and Dragons fusion where Anakin is an aasimar (as are Luke and Leia), but the composite setting drifted far enough from either that it became an original fic in a universe powered by the blessings/curses of the gods. It follows a sorceress of the god of the Void who takes on the care of a troubled demigoddess. I wrote a ton of background material, but only 1200 words of actual fic.

- After only cutting things out and fixing the gaps for years, I wrote two full chapters of my original fantasy novel; I’ve decided to take out a big chunk of one of them, but even so, it’s very satisfying, and (after a lot of cuts) brought the whole thing to 72k.

And I think that’s everything!
anghraine: david rintoul as darcy in the 1980 p&p in a red coat (darcy (1980))
One of the things I love about Darcy canonically having to work himself up to talking to Elizabeth when he first gets interested in her is that … honestly, it’s not that his feelings for her at that point are all that strong.

I mean, it takes him time to get there! He’ll later say that falling in love with her happened gradually. He’s just kind of reluctantly intrigued when he has the genius idea that maybe listening to her talk to other people will make it easier to talk to her himself. A great passion for Elizabeth isn’t making him like that; his own personality is.

There are also later events and conversations that suggest he is genuinely awkward and uneasy around people he doesn’t know well or isn’t comfortable with, and a few occasions when he talks about jarring people in general. Those aside, though, his “what if … I just listened to her talk …?” lightbulb moment always has a special awkward turtleduck charm for me.

And it’s all the more delightful because he is otherwise a stubborn, straightforward, frequently arrogant human being. But when he’s out of his depth, he’s really out of his depth, even when he’s trying harder. And even then, Austen is insistent on this as a character detail alongside his ultra-competence in so many other ways and … what a fave!! <3

Tagged: #have i mentioned lately that i love book!darcy a LOT??? (she says after having monologued about him for 15 years) #and it's always kind of amazing that he's been so influential and there are so many characters like him but also ... they aren't really? #the blend of assurance and awkwardness is just really hard to carry off imo and she does it /so/ well #where i think a lot of derivative and adaptational versions end up skewing strongly one way or the other #anghraine's meta #sorta #since i don't have a tag for just throwing squee at the page :P #ALSO this is why elizabeth going from 'maybe you should just try :) harder :)))' to trying to shield him is always so dear to me #like #if he's not really awkward and uncomfortable Deep Down then it makes that part of her arc really odd and disconcerting #but if he needs to actually put some effort into social things AND they're genuinely difficult and draining for him #then it becomes this sweet mutuality thing and one of my top fave things about the whole ship #:)
anghraine: darcy and elizabeth after the second proposal in the 1979 p&p (darcy and elizabeth [proposal])
An anon said:

One of my biggest issues with 1995 P&P is that both Darcy and Elizabeth look too old. David Rintoul's Darcy was definitely too robotic for my tastes but I definitely got "young and fashionable" vibes from him.

I replied:

It’s not one of my biggest, in that there are a lot of other things that bother me more, but it does bug me, can’t lie. Just about everyone seems 5-10 years older than they should.

It definitely contrasts with the 2005 and 1980, where IIRC the ages are kind of all over the place, so some are spot-on or nearly so, and others are wayyyy off. If I recall correctly, the 1995 is more consistent but also almost always ‘off’ in that 5-10 year range.

I know this seems trivial to some people, but I think the ages do matter to their backgrounds and developments and general characterizations. Not just the young ones, either—Mrs Bennet would be barely middle-aged and Mrs Gardiner is almost certainly in her 30s. That affects the impression they give (to the audience and to the other characters) and their own experiences and personalities and dynamics with other people.

And I do think that Garvie and Knightley come across as early 20-somethings where other Elizabeths have a certain … hm, air of maturity about them that doesn’t fully work for me. Meanwhile, Darcy is literally introduced as a “young man,” is still in his 20s, and (like Elizabeth) has a character arc that rests on brand! new! experiences! And I think that the adaptations generally are—not interested in getting that across with him. But the 1995 is especially uninterested in that aspect IMO, so generally speaking, I’m with you there.

(I also agree that Rintoul is too far on the robotic end, but does come across as fashionable! It’s an interesting choice, because at first, Darcy seems to simultaneously resent ‘the world’ [i.e. the fashionable world] while also being judgy about people not being part of it. He’s not a fop by any means, but he is part of a certain world, and the ways in which he doesn’t fit aren’t visible, sometimes even to him.)
anghraine: judy parfitt as lady catherine de bourgh in the 1980 p&p; text: #girlboss (lady catherine [heart])
An anon said:

I just reread Subsequent Connections on AO3, and was wondering in that universe, what the Fitzwilliam family reaction would be to a Darcy/Elizabeth relationship? If they had any ambitions for Darcy's marriage, I guess there would be some disappointment with Elizabeth, but at the same time she is family, and the coming back from the dead thing makes it hard to begrudge her I guess! And I'm curious about Lady Catherine's reaction to her daughter being jilted for her favourite niece this time...

I replied:

Yeah, that’s pretty spot-on, I think. One of Lady Catherine’s objections to canon Elizabeth is that she’s unallied to the family at large, which wouldn’t be an issue here, even while they certainly had higher ambitions for Darcy than a quasi-poor relation. But SC!Elizabeth is still a Fitzwilliam and they already love her, so it’s easier.

Also, I imagine that some of the Fitzwilliams would guess what was going on before Elizabeth did herself, lol. Eleanor, certainly James, and oddly enough, probably Milton. Cecily would like to see it but can’t quite associate Darcy with romance. Lord Ancaster is completely oblivious, as is (in a sadder way) Lady Ancaster. And Lady Catherine, of course.

It would definitely be hardest for Lady Catherine, both because of her plans for Anne and Darcy, and because she’s genuinely fond of Elizabeth and has planned for her advancement. I think she’d be less angry, but more upset, if that makes sense (there would still be a Scene) but come around much more quickly when the usurper is an actual Fitzwilliam.

anghraine: rows of old-fashioned books lining shelves (books)
An anon said:

Elizabeth/Colonel Fitzwilliam is a NOTP for me as well, the pairing seems to only exist to torment Darcy!

I replied:

*fistbump*

I know there are people who ship it for its own sake, as happens with any ship, but I get a reallyyyy strong “so THERE, Darcy” flavor from a lot of it.

Profile

anghraine: vader extending his lightsaber; text: and now for the airing of grievances! (Default)
Anghraine

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6789101112
1314 151617 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 05:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios