Tumblr crosspost (9 November 2019)
Aug. 1st, 2021 12:26 pmI reblogged some meta I'd written back at the end of Sep 2012.
Rambling About Amon(emphasis on rambling)
I really don’t see how Amon’s history as Noatak “ruined” him. Maybe it’s because I’m that weird person who thinks that the backstory actually did far better by him than Tarrlok, and that it’d be predictable, thematically dull, and less coherent if he had been the “good” brother and Tarrlok the naturally assertive, power-relishing one. But I keep hearing people say that the backstory’s content (if not the pacing or the dialogue) makes Tarrlok more complex and interesting, but completely wrecks Amon’s character as established earlier, especially in “The Revelation.”
Um. Maybe I was hanging out in completely different fandom spaces, because for most of the series, the two things I heard over and over and over about Amon were:
(1) Amon is badass and complex and fascinating. A villain who a substantial portion of the audience can’t help but fundamentally agree with—however much we deplore his methods—is considerably more intriguing than someone whose motivation comes down to BURN KILL DESTROY (looking at you, Ozai). Amon is compelling, he makes good points, he has bucketloads of charisma, he’s scary, he has incredibly creepy powers, and holy genre savviness, Batman! <3
(2) All that stuff he said in “The Revelation”? Totally lying.
( Read more... )
Rambling About Amon
I really don’t see how Amon’s history as Noatak “ruined” him. Maybe it’s because I’m that weird person who thinks that the backstory actually did far better by him than Tarrlok, and that it’d be predictable, thematically dull, and less coherent if he had been the “good” brother and Tarrlok the naturally assertive, power-relishing one. But I keep hearing people say that the backstory’s content (if not the pacing or the dialogue) makes Tarrlok more complex and interesting, but completely wrecks Amon’s character as established earlier, especially in “The Revelation.”
Um. Maybe I was hanging out in completely different fandom spaces, because for most of the series, the two things I heard over and over and over about Amon were:
(1) Amon is badass and complex and fascinating. A villain who a substantial portion of the audience can’t help but fundamentally agree with—however much we deplore his methods—is considerably more intriguing than someone whose motivation comes down to BURN KILL DESTROY (looking at you, Ozai). Amon is compelling, he makes good points, he has bucketloads of charisma, he’s scary, he has incredibly creepy powers, and holy genre savviness, Batman! <3
(2) All that stuff he said in “The Revelation”? Totally lying.
( Read more... )
